Non Liquet is delighted to publish the third issue on ‘Touch’ from the online Law and the Senses Series.
Following Taste and Smell, this issues explores the sense of touch in relation to the law and normativity. Described by Aristotle as the most vital and intelligent of senses, touch contains both the physical and metaphysical in its ability to express the determination of being. To manifest itself, touch relies on a precise and active bodily/physical involvement that other senses do not require: to touch is already to be active and to activate. This fundamental ontology makes touch the most essential of all senses.
Touch is deeply immersed in the here and now without being subject to spatio-temporal limitations. It refuses all representations, for its being can only exist within itself. However, Law’s temporality and representativeness are constantly open to negotiation and reinterpretation, thus making it reliant on a widely shared sense of collectiveness. With compelling contributions by Naomi Segal, Jan Hogan, Moritz Von Stetten and Michelle LeBaron, this issue attempts to look at this discrepancy and reconsiders the relation between the tactful intrusiveness of the law and the untactful movement of touch.
We have now extended the abstract submission deadline for the Law and the Senses II: human, posthuman, inhuman sensings.
The new deadline is 31st May 2016.
Law and the Senses_CfP 2016_extension
Following the success of Law and the Senses conference of 2013 and the ensuing Non Liquet online publications, we are inviting you to:
Law and the Senses_CfP 2016
The Law and the Senses series continues with taste’s neighbouring sense — smell. Smells are invisible, intangible and transitory, but despite their elusive quality they are intrinsically normative. Although hardly graspable by law, they both share the potential to perform the same acts of unification and division when constructing normative spaces. It is along these lines that this series engages with the olfactory: not as law’s object of regulation, but as a means through which the law performs, actualises, perpetuates and materialises itself. Smell exposes to view, it airs the way in which law conceptualises and contextualises its own actuality. Smell brings law forth by allowing it to show its underbelly, its elusive sense-making that is invariably sacrificed to the necessity of legal constancy. However, smell’s fragmentary, discontinuous and unstable nature, despite all the ordering that goes to it, poses a peculiar challenge to the law. This issue sets out to investigate this juncture.
We are pleased to share the conference review published on Critical Legal Thinking blog.
Non Liquet is pleased to publish the first issue on ‘Taste’ from the online Law and the Senses series.
This first issue of the Law and the Senses series deals with the sense of taste. Although perhaps non self-evident, there is a tight kinship between law and taste, primarily for the fact of sharing the same core mechanism: judgement. To taste is always to embark into a discriminating judgement over what is good and what is not. Likewise, law’s relentless juridification of the world, i.e. the reduction of the world into legal categories, could be understood as a digestive process according to which law ingests its ‘outside’ (that is, what law presupposes as its outside) by tasting it, and emitting moral judgements accordingly.
This issue addresses taste as a tool whereby pushing law beyond the narrow confines into which it often perceives itself. Through the three contributions by Merima Bruncevic & Philip Linné, Andrea Brighenti and Nicola Masciandaro, we are offered as many compelling attempts to rethink our relation to objects and space, to reformulate the question of judgement as tentative, processual and contextual tasting, and to open up law from inside, disclosing the geo-philosophical fact of its openness to justice in the here and now.
In this Booklet you can find the programme, abstracts and notes on contributors to the Law and the Senses Conference.